How to prove carbon dating wrong
Without understanding the mechanics of it, we put our blind faith in the words of scientists, who assure us that carbon dating is a reliable method of determining the ages of almost everything around us.However, a little more knowledge about the exact ins and outs of carbon dating reveals that perhaps it is not quite as fool-proof a process as we may have been led to believe.However, in the 1960s, the growth rate was found to be significantly higher than the decay rate; almost a third in fact.
Specifically, there are two types of carbon found in organic materials: carbon 12 (C-12) and carbon 14 (C-14).
It is very difficult for scientists to know how much carbon would have originally been present; one of the ways in which they have tried to overcome this difficulty was through using carbon equilibrium.
Equilibrium is the name given to the point when the rate of carbon production and carbon decay are equal.
Radiocarbon dating is a key tool archaeologists use to determine the age of plants and objects made with organic material.
But new research shows that commonly accepted radiocarbon dating standards can miss the mark -- calling into question historical timelines.